Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: July, 2007
  • Word: Islamophobia

    The Following is from an article on Real Clear Politics, an American political analysis site that specialises in aggregating news and information from across the American political spectrum. What do you think, should Islamophobeia be viewed as worse or just as bad as racism and/or anti-Semitism? How much of a problem is it and is it justifiable? Should we even be discussing the issue?

    Why 'Islamophobia' Is a Brilliant Term
    By Dennis Prager

    What do anti-Semitism, racism and Islamophobia have in common?

    In fact, nothing.

    But according to Islamist groups, Western media and the United Nations, they have everything in common. Anti-Semites hate all Jews, racists hate all members of another race, and Islamophobes hate all Muslims.

    Whoever coined the term "Islamophobia" was quite shrewd. Notice the intellectual sleight of hand here. The term is not "Muslim-phobia" or "anti-Muslimist," it is Islam-ophobia -- fear of Islam -- yet fear of Islam is in no way the same as hatred of all Muslims. One can rightly or wrongly fear Islam, or more usually, aspects of Islam, and have absolutely no bias against all Muslims, let alone be a racist.

    Read Whole article here...

    Of course, some may argue that whereas conservatism and liberalism are ideas, Islam is a religion, and while one can attack ideas, one must not attack religions. It is, however, quite insulting to religions to deny that they are ideas. Religions are certainly more than ideas -- they are theological belief systems -- but they are also ideas about how society should be run just as much as liberalism and conservatism are. Therefore, Islam, or Christianity, or Judaism, or Buddhism should be just as subject to criticism as conservatism or liberalism.

    However, the only religion the West permits criticism of is Christianity. People write books, give lectures and conduct seminars on the falsity of Christian claims, or on the immoral record of Christianity, and no one attacks them for racism or bigotry, let alone attacks them physically. The head of the Anti-Defamation League announces that conservative Christians are the greatest threat to America today, and no one charges him with racism or Christianophobia.

    Read Whole article here...

  • Global Media: Al-Jazeera Visits the Blogosphere

    The rise of the 'blogosphere', that big amorphous community of bloggers across the world (namely you and me), Al-Jazeera English News ran this story on this relatively new phenomenon. The clip below focuses on news and opinion blogs in particular, dealing their effect and the different types of such blogs out there. I suppose this news, opinion and analysis blog is focused on aggregating and providing opinion and analysis of the news then providing investigative reporting.


  • Zimbabwe: Fear protects Mugabe says ex-crony

    Moyo: Fear helps keep Mugabe at the top
    London, United Kingdom

    28 July 2007 07:50

    Robert Mugabe's former information chief says in an interview published on Saturday that the Zimbabwean president's inner circle is afraid to get rid of him, despite current economic and political woes.

    Jonathan Moyo told the Financial Times in London there is little chance of Mugabe being overthrown or replaced, as Zimbabwe's senior military, police and intelligence officers fear the collapse of the ruling Zanu-PF party if he went.

    "Only the Joint Operations Command could go to him and tell him to stand down," Moyo told the business daily. "And they think the status quo is the safest at the moment."

    He added: "There is one thing that Mugabe says that is true: he is afraid that change will lead to the disintegration of Zanu-PF. That's why the military prefers the status quo."

    Continue Reading here...

    Jonathan Moyo was one of Mugabe's closest aids and his top spin doctors in first few years of Mugabe’s controversial land program of seizing land from white commercial farmers, then the back bone of the economy, for 'redistribution'. Most of the seized land was given to Mugabe cronies such as prominent Zanu-PF members, judges, military generals and top members of the police. The seizers are widely regarded as the cause of Zimbabwe’s food insecurity since 2000 and marked the first time the Zimbabwean government started grossly disregarding its own laws for the sake of political expediency.

    Johathan Moyo is a good example of the corrupting power that Mugabe has on some people. Originally one of Mugabe’s strongest critics he was then brought into Mugabe’s fold as the presidents spokes man until 2005 when he was discarded by Mugabe as he had out lived his usefulness to him. Since then Moyo has formed a political party of his own and plans to run for president of Zimbabwe some time.

  • South Afrirca & Zimbabwe: Thabo Mbeki's trackrecord on Zimbabwe

    SWradioAfricaZim1

    There has been some talk on the blogs these days about South Africa's persident, Thabo Mbeki,asking why he is not doing more, or anything meaningful for that matter, about the worsening situation in Zimbabwe. So I have posted an exstract from a radio interview that was done on SW Radio Africa on the 24 July 2007. I hope you find it interesting and insightful.

    Ozias Tugwarara, the man being interviewed, is the Director of the Africa Governance Monitoring and Advocacy Project - an Open Society Institute project and a human rights lawyer. He was the Executive Director for the Zimbabwe Human Rights Association or ZimRights, the advisor to a SADC regional democracy program and a senior program officer with the Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. He recently wrote a commentary entitled: ‘SADC and the AU Decide to Side with Mugabe’, where he said President Thabo Mbeki and other African leaders have conveniently allowed themselves to be confused by justifications that amount to no more than political scapegoats.

    Violet: And, you know, going back to the issue of the mediation, clearly, everyone can see that things are not well in South Africa. You know, we’ve heard reports of ZANU PF not turning up to meetings and Mugabe making his stance very clear, showing that he is not interested in the constitution. And, even this issue of the secrecy behind the talks, others say that Thabo Mbeki put these conditions most likely on the prompting of Robert Mugabe, which clearly shows that Mugabe is in control. Now, do you think Mbeki’s strategy has changed and is it Robert Mugabe who is letting him down this time?

    Ozias Tungwarara: Ya, again I think you need to look at the track record of the actors involved in all this. Particularly, those of President Thabo Mbeki and President Mugabe. President Mugabe has gone back on his word on a number of occasions. We remember the agreement that had been cobbled together in Abuja in order to resolve the land issue that leaders like Mbeki and Obasanjo had managed to push through to reach a settlement in resolving the crisis when it was actually beginning to unfold. And, President Mugabe and his government reneged on that agreement.

    There are other commitments that have been made in the past where they have again gone back. And, when you look at President Thabo Mbeki’s track record in handling the Zimbabwean issue, I think the centerpiece of his approach has been quiet diplomacy which refrains from making public criticism of the excesses that the ZANU PF government is engaging in. There are merits and de-merits to that sort of approach. But I think, largely, to a Zimbabwean citizen, to a lot of people in the region, the quiet diplomacy approach has not produced tangible results in terms of transforming the Zimbabwean crisis, or resolving the Zimbabwean crisis.

    And, on several occasions again, President Thabo Mbeki has made some comments, remarks, reactions that actually defy a lot of logic. For instance, he recognized I think the 2000, 2002, 2005 elections in Zimbabwe as legitimate whereas there was tangible evidence that had been brought to his attention that things were irregular, they had not been conducted in any way that gave people the vote or the opportunity to choose, and yet he decided to take the route that they had been legitimate. So, that casts a bit of a cloud over his ability and commitment to actually resolve the Zimbabwean crisis in an objective manner.

    I think, on several occasions as well, he has indicated to world leaders; at one time it was to President Bush when he visited South Africa, the other time it was to the former German Chancellor, where he said he had the resolution of the Zimbabwean crisis almost in hand and then it turned out that nothing of that sort was happening. So, a lot of outsiders, people who are not privy to the process, are looking at the mediation process with a lot of skepticism because of what has happened in the past which has not built any confidence. Similar confidence and energy and urgency that was evident in the DRC mediation process, for instance, the Burundi process and other processes that Mbeki has been involved in. In Zimbabwe, people tend to think that Mbeki is definitely taking sides with President Mugabe. So, it’s difficult to have a high level of confidence that the mediation will actually result in a tangible resolution of the crisis.

    You can read or listen to the interview in its entirety at the links below

    Sources:
    SW Radio Africa - Hot Seat Interview
    The Zimbabwe Situation: Transcript (bottom of the page)

  • South Africa: Zimbabwean editor shot in Johannesburg

    Zim editor shot in Johannesburg
    26/07/2007 14:02 - (SA)

    Johannesburg - The editor of an independent Zimbabwean news service based in South Africa was in serious condition after being shot in Johannesburg, his deputy editor said Thursday.

    ZimOnline said three assailants approached Abel Mutsakani as he parked his car at his home in western Johannesburg on Monday night. One of the three pulled a gun and shot Mutsakani, rupturing his lung and leaving a bullet lodged near his heart.

    "He is in a serious but stable condition," said deputy editor Abel Chapatarongo.

    Continue Reading here...

    The question arises, was this shooting the result of a botched high-jacking attempt or was it some thing more sinister? South Africa, and Johannesburg in particular, are known to have one of, if not the, highest number of high-jackings in the world and one of the highest violent crime rates in the world.

    However it is also known that the Mugabe regime is more then prepared to assault and possibly kill journalists who are critical of them. Such as Edward Chikombo who was a camera man who leaked footage of a badly beaten Morgan Tsvangirai, the leader of the opposition party the MDC, earlier this year after Tsvangirai was brutally beaten by the Zimbabwe police in whilst in custody.

    Sources:
    News24: Zim editor shot in Johannesburg
    M&G: MDC leader 'battling for his life'

  • Zimbabwe: A US Depatment of State article about Zim - very informative

    US Department of State

    Recently I came across this page on the U.S. Department of State website about the situation in Zimbabwe. It is quite old, from 2003, but I found it very interesting and relevant to what is going on right now. Not only does it detail the suffering of the Zimbabwean people and the cruelty of the Mugabe regime but it also gives one insight into the stance that the United States has towards the whole thing.

    The writer of the article makes some very good points and provides some interesting statistics. Such as how Mugabe has wilfully and completely abused and disregarded the constitution of Zimbabwe, how Zanu-PF (Mugabe’s party) have been harassing and intimidating Zimbabweans to support them, even back then. It also goes onto give an interesting view on what the ‘true roots of the crises’ are.

    The article also goes into how the government has systematically been cracking down on people’s human rights and preventing them from protesting for even the most mundane reasons. It looks at how freedom of expression and freedom of political association have been brutally banned. As well as how the Mugabe regime is ruling through a mix of feer and hunger, how it uses food to starve entire communities into submission as well as how it has undermined the economy.

    Keep in mind though that it was written back in 2003 when things were a lot BETTER and the economy, although thoroughly undermined, still worked.

    You can read the article here: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/16501.htm

  • Washington Post: "How to Talk to Iran" - whats your opinion?

    The following extract is from a Washington Post article giving a short history of US/Iranian relations and how the US should move onto a different form of dialog with Iran, as apposed to the current one where there is no dialog and they just throw insults at each other. What do you think, how should the two countries resolve their differences?

    Many believe that in the wake of Sept. 11, the United States formed an international coalition and toppled the Taliban. It would be more accurate to say that the United States joined a coalition that had been battling the Taliban for nearly a decade. This coalition -- made up of Iran, India, Russia and the Northern Alliance, and aided by massive American airpower -- drove the Taliban from power.

    The coalition then worked closely with the United States to secure agreement among all elements of the Afghan opposition on the formation of a broadly based successor to the Taliban regime.

    Only weeks after Hamid Karzai was sworn in as interim leader in Afghanistan, President Bush listed Iran among the "axis of evil" -- surprising payback for Tehran's help in Bonn. A year later, shortly after the invasion of Iraq, all bilateral contacts with Tehran were suspended. Since then, confrontation over Iran's nuclear program has intensified.

    Washington has accused Iran of supplying Iraqi militias and Afghan insurgents with weapons to attack American troops. Iran, for its part, has arrested several Iranian American citizens on what appear to be spurious charges.

    Yet Washington and Tehran still have largely coincident objectives in Iraq, as they did in Afghanistan almost six years ago. Neither wants Iraq to disintegrate. Both want the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to succeed. Indeed, Iran may be the only one of Iraq's neighbors to share that interest with the United States.

    But the situation that both nations confront has become ever more desperate, while relations between the two governments are more hostile and their discussions subject to more scrutiny.

    If they are serious, both sides should try to make their dialogue more private. Prospects for progress would be greatly increased if the conversations could be held frequently, informally and confidentially. Public meetings, held at eight-week intervals, the main purpose of which is to exchange complaints, are unlikely to produce anything of value.

    [ By James Dobbins]
    [The writer directs the International Security and Defense Policy Center at Rand Corp., a nonprofit research organization. He was the Bush administration's first envoy for Afghanistan after Sept. 11.]

    You can read the article in its entirety here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/20/AR2007072002056.html

  • South Africa: Political Party Threatens Local Blogger (Closure)

    J Uys

    Yesterday there was some closure on the whole Mystery Political Sex Blogger drama that had a political party in South Africa criticising the blogging community; causing a storm in the South African blogging community. The mystery blogger has been found out and apprehended, but not for the supposed slandering that had the political party in question up in arms.

    Juan Duval-Uys, of the one man party the Gay and Lesbian Alliance and alleged master mind behind not only the slanderous male prostitute blog that made the accusations, but also a now defunct and controversial anti-crime website, was arrested on the 22 July 2007 on a R250 (£18) theft charge. From what I can tell Mr. Uys is one very colourful character.

    You can read more about the story here:

    1) Police net alleged sex blogger
    2) Blogger awaits transfer – police
    3)'Right-wing' gay party cancels Cape congress
    4)Juan Uys arrested


    Previous Vuvuzela Posts on the Subject:

    1) South Africa: Political Party Threatens Local Blogger
    2) South Africa: Political Party Threatens Local Bloggers (The Net Widens)
    3) South Africa: Political Party Threatens Local Blogger (Update)
    4) South Africa: Political Party Threatens Local Blogger (Update3)

  • Zimbabwe: Revenge of Marxist-Leninists

    In this opinion piece written by Bill Saidi of the Zimbabwe Standard, the future of Mugabe's rule over Zimbabwe is thoerised. Saidi clearly thinks that there is a clear method to Mugabe's madness and that is to turn Zimbabwe in a North Korean like, Stalinist state where the state, Mugabe and his cronies, own and control every thing in the country and brutally oppress their own people to keep power.

    I share Saidi's opinion on this matter, that Mugabe is willfully destroying his own country to create a power structure that will keep him in power for ever. Below is a copy of the article.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Revenge of Marxist-Leninists

    Zimbabwe Standard

    sundayopinion by Bill Saidi

    COMMUNISM may be dead in most parts of the world, but there must be a strong longing for it among many in the hierarchy of Zanu PF.

    At independence, the party’s ideologues and apparatchiks were sorely disappointed at their failure to immediately implement the avowed Marxist-Leninist policies espoused so enthusiastically during the struggle.

    The economy, saddled with sanctions, was tied hand and foot to apartheid South Africa.

    Moreover, there was the land issue, not to be touched until after ten years of independence.

    Even the one-party system, seen as a priority prelude to the creation of a truly communist regime was put on the back-burner, particularly as PF-Zapu, the coalition partner in the first government, showed little enthusiasm for it.

    Zanu PF chafed at the bit and when the occasion presented itself to redistribute the land, the party grabbed it with undisguised relish, unleashing its own version of the "collectivization" farm programme attempted — with disastrous consequences — by one of the two communist giants which backed the struggle, the Soviet Union.

    The political fallout was enormous, resulting in the Near-Doomsday scenario the country faces today.

    But then came what could be called a plan of Mephistophelean genius, with all the devilish hallmarks of a fanatical believer in the "dictatorship of the proletariat", with a dash of the socialist credo of "the ownership of the means of production by the people".

    First, the party would force Big Business to slash prices by 50 percent. If they shut down, then the government, which is The Party by any other name, would take over their businesses.

    Second . . . the rest would be child’s play. The economy would then be controlled by The Party, through its proxy, the government.

    All the previous owners of commerce and industry would be excluded on some pretext or other.

    Zanu PF would control everything — the banks, mines, the land, industry and commerce. Nothing would happen without Zanu PF’s approval. Free enterprise would be killed.

    The Party’s dream of a Marxist-Leninist regime would be realised, free of charge. Everyone who disapproved — Zimbabwean, British, American, Australian, New Zealander, Ghanaian, South African, Nigerian, Icelandic, Russian, or Mongolian — would be told "to go hang".

    Even the campaign against Archbishop Pius Ncube is an integral part of this grand Marxist plan: churches would operate only if they pledged allegiance to The Party, whose own moral code is a dark, impregnable mosaic of contradictions in human depravity.

    And this could come to pass, unless the few men and women of innocence left in The Party and The Opposition wield enough influence over the lunatic fringe to force it from the brink of Apocalypse.

    If they allow the Marxist-Leninists to achieve their revenge on the people of Zimbabwe, then posterity might include them in The Final Indictment on Judgement Day.

    Zimbabwe is at a defining moment in its young history. Since 2000, the country has drifted into an economic void, not to mention a political nowhere-ness authored by a party which swears by its roots in bloodshed. Since 11 March this year, there has been a shift from dialogue to death.

    In the Zanu PF hierarchy, the strength of the Marxist-Leninists has grown proportionately with the number of people killed in political violence.

    For all Zimbabweans, the choice is crystal clear: a return to the Days of Hope before 2000 or a plunge down The Dark Hole of Skeletons — of the 40 000 who died in the liberation struggle and the 20 000 who died during Gukurahindi.

    For the moment, forget the sudden low prices of essential commodities. The price to be paid for voting for Zanu PF on the basis of this short-term salvation from deprivation could be very high: the handover of the country to the Marxist-Leninists.

    And the end of hope.

    nSaidib@standard.co.zw

    Source: http://www.thezimbabwestandard.com/viewinfo.cfm?linkid=21&id=6937

  • US: Bush is cornered on torture

    In this Television Interview from 11 September 2006 with Matt Lauer, a reporter from the MSNBC show "Today", corners Bush on his defense and promotion of torture by US government officials. The message Bush has for America, support our methods or your "families" will die. Notice the hostile body language between the two, with Bush pointing and poking him.


  • Zimbabwe: a clip detailing Mugabe’s crack down on the 11 of March prayer meeting

    As part of my series on the situation in Zimbabwe I have posted this clip that I found on YouTube. It details a very specific incidence that happened not to long ago in Zimbabwe, 11 March 2007, when members of the main opposition political party in Zim, the MDC, were attacked by Mugabe’s security forces at a prayer meeting in Harare. At this event the leader of the MDC was particularly badly beaten.

    The clip details the extent of the beatings, the reasons for the beatings, who the ‘policemen’ really were who beat up the protesters, and what the MDC has to say about these beatings and their ramifications.


    You can read more about the incidence in question in this article by the South African Mail & Guardian newspaper published the day after:
    http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__africa/&articleid=301764

    You can read more about the prayer meeting in question here:
    http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=301595&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__africa/

    Here is another article from Gulf News, a Middle Eastern English newspaper, this article is about Mugabe’s methods of governorship, some of its effects on the country, and how Mugabe bribes his cronies into supporting him to the detriment of the county.
    http://archive.gulfnews.com/articles/07/07/20/10140402.html

  • Zimbabwe: An example of an outlandish article written by a Mugabe crony

    This Opinion & Analysis article in today’s edition of the government owned Zimbabwe Herald was just so outlandish and ridiculous it had me rolling around with laughter the entire time I was reading it. Its sheer lack of respect for truth is mind blowing. The way in which it twists events, facts, fiction, public opinion, and Dells own words and actions in such a way as to defend, support, and even lionise Robert Mugabe and his cronies is simply breath taking. Its propagation of factoids and appeals to truthiness is overbearing.

    If I did not know any better I would have sworn that this article was a satirical piece written for a comedy sketch. So for your entertainment I have submitted the article below and added in my own comment in the [ ].

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dell missed only by MDC

    By Isdore Guvamombe

    NOBODY can fight time and reality for that will be akin to impish attempts to paint the air.

    So US ambassador Christopher William Dell, who left Zimbabwe last Saturday, found out as he ended up sneaking out without bidding farewell to President Mugabe.
    [ Dell hardly “sneaked out” Mugabe and every one else knew full well that his term on the diplomatic staff in Zimbabwe for the US was up and that he was being recalled back to Washington]

    Progressive Zimbabweans will remember Dell as an evil man who sponsored the petrol-bombing of innocent men, women and children; an evil man who sought to remove the wheels from the Zimbabwean economy in his attempt to embellish his reputation as Uncle Sam’s Mr Fix-it.
    [If a “progressive Zimbabwean” is some one who has complete distain for the rule of law, human rights, the welfare of the average Zimbabwean and is in the pocket of president for life Robert Mugabe; then yes they will remember Dell as an evil man]

    The scars Dell left in Zimbabwe are too raw to forget. Remember the gory pictures of the two female police women petrol-bombed by suspected MDC youths in Marimba?
    [There is absolutely no evidence that Dell was involved, in any way, in the petrol bombings. There is evidence, however, of Mugabe’s cronies in the Central Intelligence Organisation of being involved in the bombings so as to dirty the name of the MDC and to give them an excuse to crack down on them further]

    Good riddance to bad rubbish, Dell has gone to Hell where he belongs.
    [If you call being called away to the United States, a first world country, and away from the living ‘hell’ of Mugabe’s Zimbabwe moving back to Hell then I would rather be in Hell thank you very much]

    His time was up after three years of failing to understand Zimbabwe’s political vectors as he desperately sought to break President Mugabe’s resistance to British and American regime change tactics.

    What baffles many is that hardly two days before Dell’s departure a schooled diplomat from Russia, Ambassador Oleg Scherbak, bade farewell to President Mugabe after completing his mission.
    [Not a good example, it is no secret that the Russian government are not the biggest believers in human rights in this world]

    As expected, the battered and bruised Dell did not have the courage to face his nemesis, and stole out like a common thief following the footsteps of Sir Brian Donnelly, the British spy who also found the going tough in Zimbabwe.
    [“stole out like a common thief” as apposed to Mugabe and his cronies are actively behaving like common thieves raping their own country and stealing from the average Zimbabwean so as to stay in power]

    After coming to Zimbabwe as warmongers masquerading as diplomats, we were not shocked when Dell and Donnelly flouted diplomatic etiquette by sneaking out of the country without bidding their host farewell.
    [Mugabe flouted diplomatic ‘etiquette’ fare more seriously when he threatened Dell and threw him in prison]

    Maybe we expected too much, honey comes from bees, not flies!
    [This is so true, especially when Mugabe is the fly]

    Dell came to Harare a dragon breathing the fire of misplaced regime change and intoxicated with the destruction he wrought on the Yugoslavs. He, however, left a humbled man with egg all over his face.
    [So is that how Mugabe’s thugs refer to some one who is moving up in the world?]

    It was easy for the Government to beat Dell at his game because the cowboy was so myopic; he always tipped his hand.
    [Unlike Mugabe’s way of doing things, which involves electricity, your testicals, and a meat hook.]

    Dell, like many Americans, seems to have been socialised into believing that he was mightier than other people as he thought Zimbabwe should be governed in the manner he saw fit.
    [If you think governing in such a way as to create a 85% unemployment rate, a life expectancy of 38 years (down from 60 just 10 years ago) and an economy that has imploded faster than any country not at war in living memory, is a good way of governing; then I guess Dell was wrong to criticise the Mugabe government]

    After taking his destructive antics to every facet of Zimbabwean life in an impish attempt to effect illegal regime change, Dell must have found it difficult to accept that he had failed.
    [The only thing illegal in this context is Mugabe regime not changing.]

    But excuse me Mr Fix-it, Zimbabwe is not Kosovo let alone Luanda or Maputo.
    [So true, it is much worse.]

    President Mugabe is not Slobodan Milosovic; he is not Mohamed Siad Bare.

    President Mugabe is the greatest son of Africa, a political grandmaster whose gamesmanship, antics, vision and wisdom have left not only Dell but also generations of imperialists wondering what hit them.
    [If Mugabe is Africa’s “greatest son” then I would hate to see what Africa’s worst son would be like.]

    From the day he took over from Joseph Sullivan in 2004, Dell dabbled in opposition politics as if he were Zimbabwean.

    Admitted, Dell was on a mission to clandestinely effect illegal regime change in Zimbabwe but the failure of his project frustrated him so much that he could no longer hide his intentions, he was so pathetic. What a sore loser!
    [Dell never lost, he has helped expose Mugabe’s evil regimen and economic mismanagement time and time again, and this has angered Mugabe as his cronies, such as the author of this article.]

    In June 2004 Dell, just nine days after Tony Blair told the world that he was pursuing regime change in Zimbabwe, appeared before a US Congressional hearing and laid bare his agenda:

    "If confirmed (as ambassador to Zimbabwe) I would continue the efforts of our government in seeking Zimbabwe’s re-emergence as a country with a legitimate democratically elected Government that reflects the rule of law and human rights . . .’’
    [The author seems to be criticising any attempt for Zimbabwe to have a “legitimate democratically elected government”]

    Three years down the line, Dell left Harare a wreck of nerves, his much-vaunted reputation as America’s "Mr Fix-it’’ in tatters.
    [Dell is viewed as a hero be many in Zimbabwe and abroad and he never had a reputation as a “Mr Fix-it”]

    He came riding on the bloody legacy of military excursions that ranged from the "accidental" bombings of Kosovar Maternity Ward and civilian buses on the streets of Belgrade, to infinite hiccups in Mozambique and Angola’s civil wars and tried to apply the same in Harare.
    [This is a wonderful example of cherry picking facts]

    He tried to relive his experiences in Kosovo and Belgrade on the streets of Highfield and Glen Norah; his hand was evident in the bombings at Sakubva and Marimba police stations.
    [The only evident hand in those bombings was Mugabe’s]

    Due to Dell’s desperation, innocent men, women and children suffered permanent injuries. They lost property and they will never forget him for his terrorism.
    [Just substitute Mugabe for Dell in this line and it would be factually correct]

    After the Government thwarted that violence, Dell hatched more plans, this time on the price hikes using his so-called Fishmongers.

    As prices skyrocketed Dell continued with his provocative, combative and confrontational approach issuing statements to the effect that the Government would be on its knees within six months. When Government once again closed that front, Dell was left clueless, with no time on his hands to organise anything else; he stole out like a spy coming from the cold.
    [The only one responsible for the price hikes and inflation was Mugabe by paying for every thing by simply printing more money and bankrupting businesses that could produce foreign currency earning for Zim.]

    In October 2005, Dell trespassed into a restricted security zone at the Botanical Gardens in an apparent attempt to provoke a diplomatic row. A year later, he walked out of a meeting in which the Government had invited him and other diplomats, before the meeting had even started. It was a very undiplomatic, rude thing to do.
    [What is a restricted security zone doing in the middle of a public botanical garden?]

    Dell used to hold secret meetings with the opposition and its allied groups. Fine, it was his right to associate but he never walked out of any of their meetings because those involved were American puppets.
    [That’s because, unlike the government, they were concerned about the plight of Zimbabwe to some extent.]

    Dell’s subversive activities brought untold suffering on innocent people, but he was undeterred since no American could be injured in Highfield, Glen View or Sakubva, no American policeman could be petrol-bombed at Marimba or Sakubva police stations.

    The cruel man has gone and will not be missed except, maybe, by the MDC and Morgan Tsvangirai.
    [And the rest of Zimbabwe’s population with the exception of Mugabe and about 5000 of his cronies]

    The Herald website: http://www.herald.co.zw/

  • US media: Bill O’Reilly, the suspect American right

    Bill O’Reilly is one of the most prominent, far right, political ‘current affairs’ commentators in the United States today. He has his own online journal, radio program, and hosts his own show called the “O’Reilly Factor”, on Fox News, which has about 2 million viewers in the US. Below is a clip from one of his most recent programs.


    I just love the part in this video where O’Reilly sends one of his staffers out to ambush the CEO of Jet Blue as he is coming out of his apartment and then moments later when the interview is over Bill O’Reilly has the nerve to say that they did not ambush the man. This sort of misinformation and use of blatant lies is common on the O’Reilly factor.

    I do agree that the Daily KOS, the website that O’Reilly hates so much and Jet Blue is sponsoring, is a left leaning website by American standards but I will let you judge for your self if all they do is, as O’Reilly puts it, “wish people who they disagree with ill.” Then again, knowing how much and often Bill O’Reilly likes to twist the facts and his sheer disrespect for the truth, I find it difficult to believe him; as is shown in the clip below.


    And finely some thing light hearted, a episode of the Colbert Report that Stephen Colbert, a popular American political satirist, did when O’Reilly was a guest on his show.

    O'Reilly on the Colbert Report

    Of Interest

    The DailyKOS: http://www.dailykos.com/
    The O’Reilly Factor: http://www.foxnews.com/oreilly/
    Bill O’Reilly Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_O'Reilly_Factor

  • Zimbabwe: Mugabe starts cracking down on theatre

    Mugabe’s intolerance of criticism is renowned. It is illegal to make any derogatory remarks or directly criticise Mugabe in any way in Zimbabwe. It is an offence that is punishable by a long prison sentence. One example of this was of an old women in Harare who said to one of her friends and was over heard by the CIO (secret police) saying that Mugabe was “Hitler.” She was promptly arrested for a long jail term. This was just days after Mugabe called him self “Hitler one thousand times over.”

    Anyway, today Mugabe’s intolerance has reached new levels, he is now trying to censor theatre productions and is making threatening remarks to Zimbabwes actors and playwrights to pretend that every thing is doing well in the country. In this article by the Mail & Guardian, a South African newspaper owned by a black Zimbabwean, Mugabe’s suppression of theatre is exposed in full detail.

    You can read the original article here:
    Mugabe's fist comes down on stage: M&G, 17 July 2007

    Below is the article in it’s entirely.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Mugabe's fist comes down on stage

    Tonderai Kwidini | Harare, Zimbabwe

    "If I am going to change anything in my script, it will be punctuation marks. I am not changing anything else," says Cont Mhlanga, a prominent Zimbabwean playwright and founder of Bulawayo-based Amakhosi Theatre Production House, in response to the banning of his play titled The Good President.

    He is the latest victim of the crackdown by President Robert Mugabe's government on perceived enemies of the state in the arts world. Plays such as Heaven's Diary and Mhlanga's Super Patriots and Morons have been banned in the past few years.

    The Good President chronicles political and social events since Zimbabwe became independent in 1980. It pays particular attention to the period just after independence, which is commonly referred to as "the dark era".

    This was the time when the Matabeleland massacre took place during an operation code-named "Gukurahundi". An estimated 20 000 people were murdered in the slaughter carried out mainly in the southern parts of Zimbabwe that supported then opposition leader Joshua Nkomo.

    The play revisits these events, building up to the present day with an emphasis on how the country has been governed.

    It stirred controversy when it premiered at the Theatre in the Park in Harare recently, attracting large crowds and provoking debate on what has happened in the country. The state media, which reflects government thinking, did not waste time in dismissing the play as the work of enemies of the state seeking regime change.

    According to a synopsis of the play, The Good President explores the institution of leadership in the broader sociopolitical context. Using his masterful skills as a playwright, Mhlanga explores recent political events such as the beatings of political and civic leaders like Morgan Tsvangirai to illustrate Mugabe's leadership.

    Tsvangirai is the leader of Zimbabwe's main opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).

    "It is a play for everyone, but deliberately targeted at the political leadership as the brick and mortar that binds society together. As typical satire the play employs humour, ridicule, irony and exaggeration to criticise the bad aspects of society in dramatic style.

    "The writer's assertion is that there is a no more vicious way of killing humanity than failing to respect and defend the institution of leadership," according to the synopsis.

    Masquerade
    The government dismissed the play as the work of political activists masquerading as artists. "The play is not of any national value. It seeks to stir emotions and hate with the ulterior motive to see President Mugabe out of power. It undermines the person of the president," said Deputy Minister of Information and Publicity Bright Matonga.

    Mhlanga denies this, saying: "It is not part of our African culture to beat a popularly elected leader and then to display the images for the young ones to see."

    Despite the attack on the play, he remains defiant. "I will not rewrite the play. How can a play based on true historical events and incidents and on knowledge in the public domain be unlawful? I did not base my creativity on fictitious events and incidents," he says, according to a statement.

    "It seems what is unlawful in this country is to speak the truth, even if all the facts are there for everybody to see," he said. "Self-expression is a human right that no one, not even the state, has the right to take away.

    "In my view, there is nothing flowery and poetic about the current situation in Zimbabwe. There is nothing flowery and poetic about a political leadership that celebrates state violence. There is nothing flowery and poetic about millions of people in the country who cannot afford to put a single decent meal on the table for their families.

    "There is nothing poetic and flowery about an economy of which the inflation is heading towards 5 000%," Mhlanga insists.

    With public protests, gatherings and a once-vibrant media shut down, theatre is one of the last channels through which people can voice their anger against the increasingly unpopular government.

    Banned
    The Good President had a good run in Harare, where it was performed for two weeks. According to the producers, the leaders of the dreaded Zimbabwe secret service attended, but did not attempt to ban it.

    It was, however, banned last month before a performance in Zimbabwe's second-largest city of Bulawayo. Mhlanga and the producer of the play, Rooftop Promotions, launched a High Court appeal against the ban, which was dismissed. They were ordered to seek an out-of-court settlement with the police.

    They have decided to launch another High Court appeal, this time in Harare.

    "We are going to challenge the High Court decision made by the Bulawayo-based judge because we feel it is tantamount to denying us our freedom of expression. We do not see the play as undermining or as seeking to denigrate President Mugabe. We are not going to be intimidated and we will continue writing, producing and staging political satires, come rain or thunder," says Daves Guzha, the producer of The Good President.

    Mhlanga is not new to controversy. He had a run-in with the police when he was locked up and interrogated last year over his political satire Pregnant with Emotion. The play was about a child who refused to be born, fearing that he or she would not be able to cope with the crisis prevailing in Zimbabwe.

    Mhlanga's latest play joins a long list of theatre productions that have been deemed to be undesirable by the government's Censorship Board, which is still using laws dating from the era of the white regime, such as the Censorship and Control Act of 1967.

    Among some of the plays that have been censored by the government are Super Patriots and Morons, which was banned three years ago; State of the Nation; and All Systems Out of Order. "We are witnessing a systematic attack on theatre as an alternative voice," says Guzha.

    Meanwhile, the Censorship Board is considering banning yet another play that is highly critical of the government. The play is titled Decades of Terror and talks about how the government has presided over the country in a "ruinous manner" since independence.

    Although the play successfully premiered in Harare three weeks ago, it is yet to receive a certificate from the Censorship Board to clear it for public performances.

    "We have applied for a certificate from the Censorship Board, but they are taking their time to process our papers. We gave them everything that they requested, the scripts and all our plans with the play, but they have not come back to us and we are getting worried," says Daniel Maphosa, the writer of the play and the director of Savanna Trust, which will supervise public performances of the play.

    "We are just hoping that the play will not get into the same situation as The Good President and get censored. But if that happens, we are still determined to go ahead and stage the play without the blessings of the Censorship Board." -- IPS

  • Zimbabwe: 7 links to 7 news sites and blogs about the alarming situation in Zim

    So many things have been happening in the past few weeks in Zimbabwe that I can not possibly contain it all into one post. In response to a monthly inflation rate of around 4500%, which is expected to increase to 10 000% by next year, the Mugabe government has decided to make price increasing illegal. This essentially means that it is illegal for most businesses (ie legal, tax paying businesses) to make a profit or even enough money to survive.

    This edict has set off a chain of events that are very rapidly affecting Zimbabwe in an alarming way which will have/ is having dire consequences for neighbouring countries. With so much news happening so fast I have decided to proved a list of links to other sites that are closely tracking the situation.

    1) The Zimbabwe Situation: http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/
    2) This is Zimbabwe: http://www.sokwanele.com/thisiszimbabwe/
    3) The Bearded Man: http://thebeardedman.blogspot.com/
    4) Harare Diary: http://firepussy.gnn.tv/
    5) Quoting Mugabe: http://quotingmugabe.blogspot.com/
    6) Random Reality: http://randomreality.blogware.com/
    7) Photos From My Phone: http://photos-from-my-phone.blogspot.com/

  • Iraq & US: US soldiers reflect on Iraq

    'The carnage, the blown-up bodies I saw ... Why? What was this for?'

    Terrifying house raids; random checkpoint shootings; speeding convoys that wipe out anyone in their path. Interviews with 50 US war veterans back from Iraq reveal the terrible daily brutality they inflicted on innocent civilians. A unique investigation by Chris Hedges and Lailia al-Arian

    Read on: here
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2125142,00.html

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The above story is from the Guardian News website; it details and examines many acts of the human rights violations, hostility, as well as demonstrations of disrespect that American soldiers are showing towards civilians in Iraq. I found it very insightful into not only the occupation in Iraq but also group and individual psychology in stressful situations and a lack of exposure to the society at large that they operate in. I also found it interesting to see how and when these individuals came to terms with these acts and how little is being done to reintegrate them back into society.

  • DISPATCH: ZIMBABWE - The Story

    Here is a fluffy video about the terrible situation in Zimbabwe. It is made by DispatchMusic for the Dispatch Zimbabwe concert taking place in Madison Square gardens in New York. I will be writing another post soon about the rapidly deteriorating situation in Zimbabwe. It looks like, after 5 years of predictions, every ones fears about Zimbabwe's economy going into melt down are now coming true.


  • Another FOX News Attempt to Smear Al Gore and Cat Stevens


    Whist wondering through the numerous stories on digg I cam across this article from NewsHounds about Fox News’ attempt to smear Al Gore and the Live Earth concert. Fox News does this by noting that Yusuf Islam, formerly known as Cat Stevens, played at one of the Live Earth concerts that Al Gore promoted. Fox then goes onto try and portray Yusuf Islam as a terrorist sympathizer (if not an out right terrorist) by inviting an ‘expert’ who I can only describe as being thoroughly suspect in his expertise on the subject.

    This reminds me of a statement two former editors for Fox news in the Middle East made before they quite working for the station. In their resignation letter, Serene Sabbagh and Jomana Karadsheh wrote "We can no longer work with a news organization that claims to be fair and balanced when you are so far from that.”

    I will say one thing about Fox News, for some reason I always find their sheer lack of respect for truth and surreal attitude towards the world very funny and always good for a laugh.

  • News Anchor refuses to read Paris story on the air


    In this clip Mika Brzezinski of MNSBC America refuses, on air, to open the news with a trivial report on Paris Hilton's release from jail. I have found a new hero in the media. Why should the attention seeking antics of a professional socialite be more important news then suicided attacks in Iraq and events of global significance. What really gets my goat is how unprofessional the other two reporters are about it, particularly the one on the right. You go girl!

  • International Development: Good News, Global Poverty is Decreasing

    The percentage of people in developing countries living in extreme poverty (the number of people living off less then US$1 a day) has decreased from 30% in 1990 to 19.2% in 2004. This, however, does not mean that less people are living in extreme poverty.

    As is detailed in this article from The Economist, rapid economic growth in places like India and China has greatly reduced the proportion of people living in extreme poverty globally. In fact China met its poverty eradication goals of halving its 1990 poverty levels by the time the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were set in 2000 to halve global poverty from 1990 levels by 2015.

    The world is wealthier and more prosperous today then in any other time in human history and, despite climate change, it looks like the world will only get wealthier. Even in Sub-Saharan Africa which has the highest proportion of people living in extreme poverty in the world and is the only place on earth that is poorer today then it was 50 years ago; extreme poverty levels have dropped from 46% in 1999 to 41% today. Again this is largely due to the fact that much of Africa is experiencing the highest rates of economic development in its post-Colonial history.

    Despite this the number of people living in extreme poverty in Africa has actually increased in the past five years. This is due to rapid population growth rates on the continent that means that although the proportion of people living in poverty will go down the number of people living in such conditions will increase by 2015.

    Refrences:
    The Economist: Surprise, the world is winning its fight against poverty

    The Millennium Development Goals website

  • Openness & Accountability: A Study of Transparency in Global Media Outlets

    The Libby, Enron and Arthur Andersen cases have all put the issue of “transparency” in the forefront of the news. But how transparent are the media themselves? How candid are they about how they cover the news? How willing are the media to make their reporting and editing standards public?

    According to this new ICMPA study most news outlets are unwilling to let the public see how their editorial process works. Fewer than half of the websites publicly corrected mistakes in their stories and only a handful shared with readers the journalistic and ethical standards that theoretically guide their newsrooms… (Results are continued in Study Conclusions)

    Accountability Barchart

    In the original article at ICMPA you can click on each media outlet above for further details.
    Each of the news outlets above was individually coded in five categories of transparency: Corrections, Ownership, Staff Policies, Reporting Policies and Interactivity. See Understanding Results for a detailed explanation of each category. The chart shows the aggregate score of those categories. For a breakdown of the coding in each of the five categories for all media outlets, see Study Conclusions.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The above article is from the One World Trust website which is an organisation that focuses on the international media, media freedom, and public policy.

    One of the things I found interesting about the study is how low Al Jazeera scored on media transparency. It is right at the bottom of the list, even lower then Fox News!

    Website:
    ICMPA: A Study of Transparency in Global Media Outlets

  • Suspected Nigerian Scammer mailing Blog.co.uk users

    A few hours ago I received an email via the Blog.co.uk system out of the blue from a Love500. Below is a copy of the message I received:

    HELLO My name is Josephine God,i saw your profile today in (Blog.co.uk)and became intrested in you,i will also like to know you more,and i want you to send an email to my email address so that i can give you my picture for you to know whom i am. Here is my email address(josephine_good@yahoo.com) I believe we can move from here! I am waiting for your mail to my email address above. (Remember the distance or colour does not matter but love matters alot in life please contact me here (josephine_good@yahoo.com)

    I thought that a message like this coming out of the blue from a person who I have had no contact with at all and who has been a member of Blog.co.uk for only a few hours was kind of strange so I googled the email address (josephine_good@yahoo.com) and it took me to this website on 419 scams and in particular dating scams. What I found there, I feel, confirmed my suspicions. Notice how the two emails are exactly the same and are both from yahoo accounts. Below is a copy of what I found.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    TtHIS WAS jULIETS FIRST LETTER (IS THE MABOU CHICK)

    HELLO My name is juliet Mabou,i saw your profile today in (talkcity.com)and became intrested in you,i will also like to know you more,and i want you to send an email to my email address so that i can give you my picture for you to know whom i am. Here is my email address(julietmabou@yahoo.com) I believe we can move from here! I am waiting for your mail to my email address above. (Remember the distance or colour does not matter but love matters alot in life please contact me here (julietmabou@yahoo.com)
    2007-02-22, 04:45:41
    anonymous from

    This was the second letter

    My Dearest,
    How are you today?
    i am very happy to your responded to the email i sent to you in your address at the site.
    I am miss godline juliet mabou.
    Age 22
    ft 5/6
    wt 59
    i am the only daughter of Late Dr Patrick Mabou from Ivory Coast in west Africa,
    who died during the war in my country last two years (2003).
    My father was the personal adviser to our former head of state .

    ( LATE GEN ROBERT GUEI) he is the owner of MabouCocoa industries (LTD) before he was assasinated along side with my mother on a cold blood one morning. But i managed to escape for my dear life and ran into a neigh bouring country,(Dakar) the capital of (Senegal) and i am reciding there now as a refugee.in the refugee camp.
    Meanwhile,I am writting to you now in at Revrend's computer and will like to know you more before we move forward from here!.

    I will like to know what you do for a living,remember that you caught my attention in that site that was why i wrote you at the first time.Here is one of my pictures i came here with,i will show you more of me when i know and see yours.Awaiting for your reply soonest from my heart.
    juliet

  • WP: Why Winston Wouldn't Stand For [George] W [Bush]

    The following is an article from the Washington Post.

    George W. Bush always wanted to be like a wartime British prime ministers. He is. But it's not the one he had in mind.

    By Lynne Olson
    Sunday, July 1, 2007; Page B01

    President Bush's favorite role model is, famously, Jesus, but Winston Churchill is close behind. The president admires the wartime British prime minister so much that he keeps what he calls "a stern-looking bust" of Churchill in the Oval Office. "He watches my every move," Bush jokes. These days, Churchill would probably not care for much of what he sees.

    I've spent a great deal of time thinking about Churchill while working on my book "Troublesome Young Men," a history of the small group of Conservative members of Parliament who defied British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasing Adolf Hitler, forced Chamberlain to resign in May 1940 and helped make Churchill his successor. I thought my audience would be largely limited to World War II buffs, so I was pleasantly surprised to hear that the president has been reading my book. He hasn't let me know what he thinks about it, but it's a safe bet that he's identifying with the book's portrayal of Churchill, not Chamberlain. But I think Bush's hero would be bemused, to say the least, by the president's wrapping himself in the Churchillian cloak. Indeed, the more you understand the historical record, the more the parallels leap out -- but they're between Bush and Chamberlain, not Bush and Churchill.

    Like Bush and unlike Churchill, Chamberlain came to office with almost no understanding of foreign affairs or experience in dealing with international leaders. Nonetheless, he was convinced that he alone could bring Hitler and Benito Mussolini to heel. He surrounded himself with like-minded advisers and refused to heed anyone who told him otherwise.

    In the months leading up to World War II, Chamberlain and his men saw little need to build up a strong coalition of European allies with which to confront Nazi Germany -- ignoring appeals from Churchill and others to fashion a "Grand Alliance" of nations to thwart the threat that Hitler posed to the continent.

    Unlike Bush and Chamberlain, Churchill was never in favor of his country going it alone. Throughout the 1930s, while urging Britain to rearm, he also strongly supported using the newborn League of Nations -- the forerunner to today's United Nations -- to provide one-for-all-and-all-for-one security to smaller countries. After the League failed to stop fascism's march, Churchill was adamant that, to beat Hitler, Britain must form a true partnership with France and even reach agreement with the despised Soviet Union, neither of which Chamberlain was willing to do.

    Like Bush, Chamberlain also laid claim to unprecedented executive authority, evading the checks and balances that are supposed to constrain the office of prime minister. He scorned dissenting views, both inside and outside government. When Chamberlain arranged his face-to-face meetings with Hitler in 1938 that ended in the catastrophic Munich conference, he did so without consulting his cabinet, which, under the British system, is responsible for making policy. He also bypassed the House of Commons, leading Harold Macmillan, a future Tory prime minister who was then an anti-appeasement MP, to complain that Chamberlain was treating Parliament "like a Reichstag, to meet only to hear the orations and to register the decrees of the government of the day."

    As was true of Bush and the Republicans before the 2006 midterm elections, Chamberlain and his Tories had a large majority in the Commons, and, as Macmillan noted, the prime minister tended to treat Parliament like a lapdog legislature, existing only to do his bidding. "I secretly feel he hates the House of Commons," wrote one of Chamberlain's most fervent parliamentary supporters. "Certainly he has a deep contempt for Parliamentary interference."

    Churchill, on the other hand, revered Parliament and was appalled by Chamberlain's determination to dominate the Commons in the late 1930s. Churchill considered himself first and foremost "a child" and "servant" of the House of Commons and strongly believed in the legislature's constitutional role to oversee the executive (even when, after becoming prime minister, he often railed against MPs who criticized him). In August 1939, when Chamberlain rammed through a two-month parliamentary adjournment just weeks before the war began, Churchill -- then still a backbencher -- exploded with anger in the House, calling the prime minister's move "disastrous," "pathetic" and shameful." He encouraged his anti-appeasement colleagues to mount similar attacks against Chamberlain, and when one of them, Ronald Cartland, called the prime minister a dictator to his face in the same debate, Churchill congratulated Cartland with an enthusiastic, "Well done, my boy, well done!"

    Likewise, Churchill almost certainly would look askance at the Bush administration's years-long campaign to shut down public debate over the "war on terror" and the conflict in Iraq -- tactics markedly similar to Chamberlain's attempts to quiet his opponents. Like Bush and his aides, Chamberlain badgered and intimidated the press, restricted journalists' access to sources and claimed that anyone who dared criticize the government was guilty of disloyalty and damaging the national interest. Just as Bush has done, Chamberlain authorized the wiretapping of citizens without court authorization; Churchill was among those whose phones were tapped by the prime minister's subordinates.

    Churchill, by contrast, believed firmly in the sanctity of individual liberties and the need to protect them from government encroachment. That's not to say that he was never guilty of infringing on them himself. In June 1940, when a Nazi invasion of Britain seemed imminent, he ordered the internment of more than 20,000 enemy aliens living on British soil, most of them refugees from Hitler's and Mussolini's fascist regimes. But as the invasion scare abated over the next few months, the vast majority were released, also by his order. "The key word in any understanding of Winston Churchill is the simple word 'Liberty,' " wrote Eric Seal, Churchill's principal private secretary during the early years of the war. "He intensely disliked, and reacted violently against, all attempts to regiment and dictate opinion. . . . He demanded for himself freedom to follow his own star, and he stood out for a like liberty for all men."

    Writing about Churchill and Chamberlain, I've discovered, is like administering a Rorschach test to one's readers. People see in Churchill and Chamberlain what they want to see. They draw parallels between the 1930s and the events of today according to their own political philosophy. I've received congratulatory letters and e-mails from people who see similarities between the current U.S. woes in Iraq and Chamberlain's disastrous conduct of the so-called phony war in 1939-40. But I've also gotten fan mail from readers who favorably compare the Tory rebels' courageous fight against Chamberlain to the Bush administration's campaign against those opposing the Iraq war. Among those who've written me in praise of the book are Bush adviser Karl Rove and Howard Wolfson, the communications director of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign.

    The president no doubt has his own Churchill. "He was resolute," Bush has remarked. "He was tough. He knew what he believed." But Churchill would snort, I believe, at the administration's equation of "Islamofascism," an amorphous, ill-defined movement of killers forced to resort to terrorism by their lack of military might, to Nazi Germany, a global power that had already conquered several countries before Churchill took office in 1940. Still, key members of the Bush administration have compared critics of the wars on terrorism and in Iraq to the appeasers of the 1930s, thus implicitly equating their boss and themselves to Churchill and the "troublesome young men" who helped bring him to power. During bleak days in Iraq, the administration's hawks can be forgiven for hoping that history will show them to be as far-sighted about a gathering storm as Churchill was in the 1930s.

    But history has its own ways, and we cannot make the long-dead titans we admire give us their modern blessing. As the world's two most prominent and powerful democracies, the United States and Britain had a responsibility to serve as exemplars of democracy for the rest of the world, Churchill believed. But to be fitting role models, he argued, both countries had to do their best to ensure that the "title deeds of freedom" were strongly safeguarded within their own boundaries. "Let us preach what we practice," he declared in his 1946 "Iron Curtain" speech in Fulton, Mo. "But let us also practice what we preach."

    contact@lynneolson.com

    Lynne Olson, a former White House correspondent for the Baltimore Sun, is the author or coauthor of four books of history.

Email subscription

You can receive the posts of this blog by email.

Calendar
<< < July 2007 > >>
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Locations of visitors to this page



Add to Technorati Favorites Afrigator

I shmaak SA Blogs, sorted with Amatomu.com
RSS Feed
RSS 1.0
Posts
Comments
RSS 2.0
Posts
Comments
Atom
Posts
Comments
About me

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.